Tuesday, February 26, 2008

The politics of Thai revisionist history

By Brian McCartan

CHIANG MAI - Thailand's new Prime Minister Samak Sundaravej has been in office less than a month but he has already stirred political turmoil with remarks about the country's past struggle for democracy and its current campaign against Muslim militants in its southernmost provinces.

This bodes ill for the country's first democratically elected government since former prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra was ousted in a September 2006 coup and its stated vow to achieve national reconciliation after years of political unrest. Samak's remarks came during interviews with international broadcasters CNN and al-Jazeera shortly after assuming the premiership in early February.

read more >>>

Sphere: Related Content

Monday, February 25, 2008

Microsoft to Open Source: You Win

Microsoft finally admitted defeat to the open source community. This, in a way, is in compliance with the pressures from the European Union. As a result, according to the Web Worker Daily, "Microsoft will be releasing today at MSDN.com over 30,000 pages of API and communication protocol developer information on its major products: Windows Server 2008, SQL Server 2008, Exchange Server 2007; with more info coming by June on Windows Vista (including the .NET Framework), Office 2007 and Office SharePoint 2007."

For more of the report, read here or here.

Sphere: Related Content

Friday, February 22, 2008

Internet surpasses magazines for ad spending

THE ASAHI SHIMBUN

The Internet surpassed magazines in terms of advertising expenditures in Japan in 2007, and now trails only television and newspapers as the media choice for ads, according to a report.

The report, compiled by advertising giant Dentsu Inc., said Wednesday that Internet ad expenditures soared 24.4 percent from 2006 to 600.3 billion yen, while the total expenditures edged up 1.1 percent to 7.0191 trillion yen.

The total for the four other major media--television, newspapers, magazines and radio--fell 2.6 percent to 3.5699 trillion yen in 2007.

read more>>>

Sphere: Related Content

Wednesday, February 20, 2008

Framing the Arroyo demise

After the Gloriagate scandal in 2005, another series of demonstrations is pounding the administration of Philippine president Gloria Macapagal Arroyo. This time, the root is the ZTE Scandal or the National Broadband Network Project of the Philippine Government. But will the Arroyo Administration crumble this time to give way to another government?

One way to answer this is by using the Joseph Estrada ouster in 2001 as a frame for the possible Arroyo demise. During that time, there were two envelopes at stake one of which was opened while the second was left undisclosed. For this frame we have Rodolfo Jun Lozada to represent "first envelope" and Romulo Neri, the "second envelope". Both are privy to the deals behind the ZTE-national broadband project. Lozada has disclosed what he knew while Neri remains evasive with the case he filed in Court. The burden now lies at the Supreme Court which can cause the opening or continuing closure of the second envelope.

If this is the frame, the best option for Malacanang is to urge Neri to withdraw the case he filed and started talking before the Senate. This is because Filipinos hate suspense and the more Neri is mum on the issue, the more restlessness will occur. The problem, however, is if Neri doesn't know how to lie. But at least, this will mitigate the restlessness being caused by the suspense. And this will further soften the stand of the Catholic Church whose bishops are calling for a moral reformation.

Another way to describe the imbroglio is by viewing the Administration officials, particularly the members of the Cabinet, as mercenaries with Arroyo as the employer. In the very first place, these people work at the mercy of the President and not out of the love for the country. Besides, according to Palace insiders, the Arroyos do not know how to cultivate loyalty. They always think that loyalty can be bought with money. Hence, if these "mercenaries" will see the Administration as a sinking ship, or if they see higher profit elsewhere compared to what they currently receive, they will most likely climb fences and leave Arroyo. Lozada, for instance, tried hard to keep his mouth shut. The problem, the wells went dry in Hongkong so he had to return to the Philippines and eventually spill the beans.

If this frame is to be followed, the best option for the Arroyos is to continually pour the money "the way things used to be in 2005," to quote a source. The problem, wells don't run full 'til eternity. Bleeding more money from corruption will just make matters worst for the ZTE Scandal, along with the others, had taught the people to be more vigilant.

Arroyo and her consultants, however, are reading the events in another frame. They look at the problem as a machination of the opposition and treat it as a minor wound. Thus, the solutions like the three-billion peso anti-corruption fund, the idea of catching the small corrupt officials, and the like. If said frame will not be abandoned, there is no reason to oppose the idea of the first family as rats packing before the 2010.###

Sphere: Related Content

Monday, February 18, 2008

When ‘Identity Politics’ Is Rational

If there’s anything everyone is against in these election times, it’s “identity politics,” a phrase that covers a multitude of sins. Let me start with a definition. (It may not be yours, but it will at least allow the discussion to be framed.) You’re practicing identity politics when you vote for or against someone because of his or her skin color, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or any other marker that leads you to say yes or no independently of a candidate’s ideas or policies. In essence identity politics is an affirmation of the tribe against the claims of ideology, and by ideology I do not mean something bad (a mistake frequently made), but any agenda informed by a vision of what the world should be like.



Read more here..

Sphere: Related Content

TIME TO GO: A CALL TO OUR COLLEAGUES IN GOVERNMENT

(A STATEMENT OF FORMER GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS)

We are former government officials who have held high positions in the current and previous administrations. Having participated in the highest level of governance up close and personal, we now feel compelled to speak up for our demoralized public servants and arrest the decline of our institutions of governance. In the past, many of us kept quiet, going on about our daily chores, attending to business as usual.

However, over the last few days, we, together with the rest of the country, have seen one man - Jun Lozada - finally decide that he can no longer be part of the massive graft and corruption that permeates this government. His testimony exposed that the corruption in the project he dealt with - the NBN ZTE project - is standard in what he called "dysfunctional government procurement processes."

Clearly, what Jun Lozada knew so terrified the powers-that-be that they unwittingly exposed what Jun called "the dark side of the state" - state-sponsored
terrorism that had been rearing its ugly head in the various disappearances and extra-judicial killings in the past six years - and which almost took him as a victim in a botched kidnapping that the administration has been trying, with little success, to cover up.

In a sense, all Jun Lozada did was to confirm what we already know: Our country is sliding into moral decadence. He also confirmed the systematic destruction of our democratic institutions and the systemic nature of our problems. We have seen this in the wanton disregard of checks-and-balances; abuse of the powers of the President; the cooptation through patronage and outright bribery of the other branches of government; politically sponsored corruption, facilitated, not thwarted, by bureaucratic procedures; the naked use of power and authority through the PNP, PSG, NAIA, among others, to strangle the truth; and the deployment of cabinet, sub-cabinet officials, and the military to obstruct justice and cover up illegal orders and acts.

In the past, for too many times that we were confronted with threats to our democracy and to our moral values, our response was: "What can we do about it? What is our choice? Who will lead us?"

These questions persist but, today, we can no longer stay silent. We can no longer ignore the reality of a government gone wild, wreaking havoc on our rights and institutions in a climate of impunity. We can no longer console ourselves in the strength of the peso, narrowing deficits, and an expanding economy. Even these ephemeral gains have not translated into a better life for the majority of our people, especially the poor.

The future of our country is at stake. Our democratic institutions are under attack. What we stand to lose is the moral fabric of our society.


We call on all government officials - Cabinet Secretaries, Undersecretaries, Heads of Agencies - who know about these anomalous transactions to join the heroic stand of Jun Lozada to come forward and speak out. We call on all those who know about the extrajudicial killings and disappearances to go public and tell the truth. We call on all those who can no longer endure this wrongful governance, with its structures of evil and unmoderated greed: IT IS TIME TO CUT CLEAN! IT IS TIME TO GO! .

Tama na! Sobra na! Panahon na!


Signed by:
1. Florencio Abad (Former Secretary, Department of Education)
2. Tomas Africa, (Former Administrator, National Statistics Office)
3. Rafael Alunan (Former Secretary, Department of Tourism)
4. Tomas Apacible (Former Commissioner, Bureau of Customs)
5. Senen Bacani (Former Secretary, Department of Agriculture)
6. Angelito Banayo (Former Secretary, Political Affairs)
7. Romeo Bernardo (Former Undersecretary, Department of Finance)
8. Gerardo Bulatao (Former Undersecretary, Department of Agrarian Reform)
9. Clifford Burkley (Former Undersecretary, Department of Social Welfare and
Development)
10. Ramon Cardenas (Former Head, Presidential Management Staff)
11. Jose Cuisia (Former Governor, Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas)
12. Sostenes Campillo (Former Undersecretary, Department of Tourism)
13. Karina Constantino-David (Former Chair, Civil Service Commission)
14. Elfren Cruz (Former Head, Presidential Management Staff)
15. Isagani Cruz (Former Undersecretary, Department of Education)
16. Teresita Quintos Deles (Former Presidential Adviser on the Peace Process)
17. Benjamin Diokno (Former Secretary, Department of Budget and Management)
18. Quintin Doromal Sr. (Former Commissioner, Philippine Commission on Good Governance)
19. Franklin Drilon (Former Executive Secretary)
20. Narcisa Escaler (Former Ambassador to the United Nations)
21. Jesus Estanislao (Former Secretary, Department of Finance)
22. Fulgencio Factoran Jr. (Former Secretary, Department of Environment and Natural
Resources)
23. Victoria Garchitorena (Former Head, Presidential Management Staff)
24. Ernesto Garilao (Former Secretary, Department of Agrarian Reform)
25. Peter Garrucho (Former Executive Secretary)
26. Jose Luis Gascon (Former Undersecretary, Department of Education)
27. Marietta Goco (Former Chair, Presidential Commission to Fight Poverty)
28. Jose Antonio Gonzalez (Former Minister, Ministry of Tourism)
29. Milwilda Guevarra (Former Undersecretary, Department of Finance)
30. Cielito Habito (Former Secretary-General, National Economic Development Authority)
31. Edilberto de Jesus Jr. (Former Secretary, Department of Education)
32. Philip Ella Juico (Former Secretary, Department of Agrarian Reform)
33. Antonio La Viña (Former Undersecretary, Department of Environment and Natural
Resources)
34. Bienvenido Laguesma (Former Secretary, Department of Labor and Employment)
35. Lina Laigo (Former Secretary, Department of Social Welfare and Development)
36. Ernest Leung (Former Secretary, Department of Finance)
37. Josefina Lichauco (Former Secretary, Department of Transportation and
Communications)
38. Narzalina Lim (Former Secretary, Department of Tourism)
39. Juan Miguel Luz (Former Undersecretary, Department of Education)
40. Felipe Medalla (Former Secretary-General, National Economic Development Authority)
41. Jose Molano Jr. (Former Executive Director, Commission on Filipinos Overseas)
42. Vitaliano Nañagas (Former Chair, Development Bank of the Philippines)
43. Imelda Nicolas (Former Lead Convenor, National Anti-Poverty Commission)
44. Roberto de Ocampo (Former Secretary, Department of Finance)
45. Oscar Orbos (Former Executive Secretary)
46. Ernesto Ordoñez (Former Secretary, Presidential Flagship Programs and Projects)
47. Victor Ordoñez (Former Undersecretary, Department of Education)
48. Cayetano Paderanga (Former Secretary-General, National Economic Development
Authority)
49. Jose Pardo (Former Secretary, Department of Trade and Industry)
50. Vicente Paterno (Former Minister, Ministry of Trade and Industry)
51. Felicito Payumo (Former Chairman, Subic Bay Metropolitan Authority)
52. Pete Prado (Former Secretary, Department of Transportation and Communication)
53. Cesar Purisima (Former Secretary, Department of Finance)
54. Victor Ramos (Former Secretary, Department of Environment and Natural Resources)
55. Amina Rasul (Former Chair, National Youth Commission)
56. Alberto Romualdez Jr. (Former Secretary, Department of Health)
57. Albert del Rosario (Former Ambassador to the United States of America)
58. Francisco del Rosario (Former Chair, Development Bank of the Philippines)
59. Ramon del Rosario (Former Secretary, Department of Finance)
60. Melito Salazar (Former Member of the Monetary Board, Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas)
61. Leticia Ramos-Shahani (Former Undersecretary, Department of Foreign Affairs)
62. Cesar Sarino (Former Secretary, Department of Interior and Local Government)
63. Juan Santos (Former Secretary, Department of Trade and Industry)
64. Corazon Juliano-Soliman (Former Secretary, Department of Social Welfare and
Development)
65. Hector Soliman (Former Undersecretary, Department of Agrarian Reform)
66. Mario Taguiwalo (Former Undersecretary, Department of Health)
67. Jaime Galvez Tan (Former Secretary, Department of Health)
68. Wigberto Tañada (Former Commissioner, Bureau of Customs)
69. Rene Villa (Former Secretary, Department of Agrarian Reform)
70. Veronica Villavicencio (Former Lead Convenor, National Anti-Poverty Commission)
71. Deogracias Vistan (Former President, Land Bank of the Philippines)

Sphere: Related Content

The Top 50 Proprietary Programs that Drive You Crazy — and Their Open Source Alternatives

By Jimmy Atkinson


Not every proprietary program can drive a person crazy, right? Some, like Norton Ghost, are superb tools for anyone to use. But, the fact that these tools are proprietary can drive open source fanatics up a wall. It’s not the price of the software that makes the real difference (although it’s a reason to migrate from one software to another for many people); it’s the idea that proprietary software comes with boundaries that keeps the user experience confined to…well, being the user. That’s enough to drive any developer crazy.

Read more>>>

Sphere: Related Content

Friday, February 15, 2008

De Castro: Misreading the Surveys

The surveys of the Social Weather Stations (SWS) show that the support for Vice President Noli De Castro's 2010 presidential bid is already taking off. From 25% in the third quarter of 2007, the figure rose to 30% in just two months. Does this mean that De Castro is already the sure successor of Gloria Macapagal Arroyo in the presidential seat?

Even before the 2004 elections, De Castro is already a "voters' favorite", an effect of his golden days in the media as a newsreader and anchorman. He fared well in the 2004 vice presidential elections and even generated vote figures higher than Arroyo. During the Gloriagate scandals, his satisfaction ratings remained positive while the administration as a whole was wallowing in an all time low rating. And, while Arroyo was already being bombarded with the calls to resign, a greater portion were hoping that De Castro take the presidential seat.

Indeed, the support for De Castro remained intact and, if the December survey is to be believed, he is already a sure winner in the 2010 presidential race. But, is he?

According to De Castro, the survey results could be because of his dedication to work. In simple terms, he is interpreting the results based on the retrospective voting theory. Which is dangerous. In his occupancy of the Office of the Vice President, he has not shown much. During Arroyo's travels, the presidential rein either remains with the Chief Executive or with Eduardo Ermita, the Executive Secretary. As a housing czar, he was not able to propose policies that will minimize, if not eradicate, homelessness. The lowering of the rates in housing loans has not attracted house buyers either as the primary needs remain to be centered on the food in the table. Similarly, the move to clean the North Rail has just displaced the squatters to other settlements. In a sense, De Castro could not claim "performance and dedication" as the major ingredients for his being a choice in the 2010 elections.

These being so, what lens should De Castro use to read the surveys?

If De Castro is to note, his indecisiveness during the Gloriagate Scandal is among the primary factors why the "Oust Gloria" clamors did not prosper. Many were looking not just for a replacement but also for a face. The idea of the transitional revolutionary government is not attractive then not because it is almost impossible but because it is unique. And, in the history of the Philippines, a face of a leader is always important. This behavior can be explained best by analyzing the religion of the Filipinos. Almost 80% of the Filipinos are Catholics not because they strictly adhere to Catholicism but because Catholicism is the only religion that offers icons and symbols. These icons and symbols are what makes them feel closer to God. Otherwise, they could have succumbed to Protestantism or Islam if political power in, or length of existence over, the country are the bases for choosing the religious belief.

As De Castro failed to give a cue on the leadership issue, the calls on Arroyo's ouster mellowed down. And as many find frustrations in the Arroyo Administration, hopes are rising for a new leader come 2010. This, in a way, is a response to De Castro's message of obedience and loyalty to the Constitution. But as De Castro remains steadfast to his silence particularly on the scandals haunting the Arroyo Administration, many might consider him as lacking the necessary balls to lead the government. If this happens, the Vice President's ratings might also fizzle out the way Raul Roco's pre-election ratings vanished.

What, then, are the bases for saying that Filipinos look prospectively and not retrospectively?

First, we have Cory Aquino then claimed to be a mere housewife. She is said to have won the elections despite lacking any track record or performance in public service. Arroyo, too, can be considered as an example when she took over as the acting president in 2001. As a matter of fact, her satisfaction ratings were very high during the first few months of her administration only to dive later as days moved on. Then Senator Francis Pangilinan can also be taken as an example. Certainly, not all who voted for him were fans of Sharon Cuneta. Of course, we have the coup d' etat senators, Gregorio Honasan and Antonio Trillanes. As they were opposing the government, they are also pushing the idea that change could be with them when elected into office.

Even culturally, Filipinos are always forward-looking. During hard times, they always hope that the wheel of life will soon turn and bring them better days.

In a sense, if the SWS surveys will be properly read, it is not a humbling message for De Castro but a challenge to strive more and show off some balls.

Sphere: Related Content

Thursday, February 7, 2008

‘Halika tawagan natin si FG’

(A Transcript of Rodolfo "Jun Lozada's" exposé on the ZTE Broadband Controversy.)

I’d like to start by thanking a lot of people who expressed their sincere sympathy for the family. I’d like to thank them first, so many of them. And in Tagalog, nagpapasalamat po ako sa lahat ng nagpahayag ng pag-aalala sa akin at sa sampu ng aking pamilya.


Ako po’y nagtawag sa pagpupulong na ito upang mabigayan ng liwanag. Madami kasing mga katanungan ang bayan ukol sa proyekto ng NBN-ZTE na ito.

At upang huwag na sanang mapilitan pa yung iba, marami nang mabubuting taong napilitan pang magsinungaling dahil sa akin. Hindi naman sila kasama rito, napipilitan pa silang magsinungaling. Ayokong maging dahilan na magkasala sa Diyos at sa bayan kahit sinoman. Ayoko ho iyon.

Mabigat po sa aking damdamin ito at isipan, ang aking gagawin. Ngunit kailangan kong gawin ito para sa kaunawaan, para maliwanag na ang isipan ng bayang ito na lubhang makaka-apekto doon sa kinabukasan nila.

Ang aking ilalahad na mga salaysay ngayon tungkol sa ZTE-NBN ay yung mga bagay na ako’y may personal na ginampanan, the things that I’m involved with. And I’m going to say this with malice to no one.

Wala ho akong malisya kahit kanino man. Ang sasabihin ko ay kung ano lang ginawa namin, at kung ano ang nangyari.

Introduced to Abalos

To my recollection of events, I’ll start off the first time I was introduced to this project by Secretary Neri, monitored action to Chairman Ben Abalos. I guess if it was not late September, early October I was introduced by Secretary Neri to Chairman Ben Abalos in Wack-Wack together with his entourage sina Ruben Reyes…and the ZTE president Yu Yong and Fan Yang. We had lunch in Wack-Wack wherein we talked about the NBN-ZTE.

I remember that the Secretary told Chairman Abalos to course his project proposal to the proper channel. NEDA received the first copy sometime in October…prepared by…All questions were referred back to Asec Formoso.

When the Secretary gave me a copy for me to review, the first three that really caught my attention, when I was reviewing the financial cost, the financial projection were based on… September 20, 2006 issue wherein they were quoting how much government was spending for telecom expenses…

…So, I told the Abalos group, through their guy Leo San Miguel, that they should revise their proposal. They should fix it and try to avoid the education part of it, because there’s already a cyber-education project.

Abalos wanted $130 million

Sometime in November, that was the time that I also met Joey de Venecia, to see the presentation on a similar project but on a BOT basis. And at that time, the Secretary asked me if the project was appropriate for NBN.

Until we presented the project proposal for the NBN. And the Secretary asked If I think it was appropriate and I said yes, so he encouraged Joey to push through the project development further.

And when the Secretary asked me if there was a synergy between the two projects I said, yes. But both of them were pitching for the same project. The Secretary told me to reconcile the two proponents. And at that point, it was really a good project.

At that point, when the Secretary told me to reconcile the two proponents, I immediately went to work and proposed one tool for the two proponents wherein both of them can achieve both of their objectives. Joey’s objective was to do a BOT with government, which was completely above board, and then Chairman Abalos’s objective was to do a loan, a project on a loan basis.

So the project structure that I proposed was that Joey becomes the lead contracting party to the government, it’s on a BOT basis anyway. And that Abalos, to achieve his objective of supplying, becomes supplier to Joey’s project.

I thought at that point it was already a win-win situation for everyone involved. The government gets its NBN project, Joey gets his BOT project, and then Abalos gets his supply comes up.

So, at one point I got them already to do their own thing. It’s finished. But I guess the trouble started when Chairman Abalos wanted to protect his $130-million… how shall I put this…commission on the project. So dapat daw proteksyonan ‘yong $130 million, (before) we agree that Joey become the main proponent.

'Bubukol po ito'

At that point, I just felt that…it might be a little too big, in the vernacular sabi ko bubukol po ito, sabi ko siguro kalahati pupuwede. But nonetheless I relayed the information to Joey, because it’s going to be Joey’s project anyway.

And Joey’s reaction was really like ballistic, parang he was worried, saan n’ya kukunin itong $130 million na ‘to, because the project cost is $262 million, and Abalos wanted $130 million na komisyon. So sabi ko sa kanila, hindi ko problema ‘yan, that’s your problem.

So at that point, I don’t know if the listener can realize how much money all of these are na pinag-uusapan…$130 million…At that point, I was telling them na problema n’yo na ito basta you make sure you’ll get this thing together because we don’t want another Atong Ang or Chavit Singson scandal to rock this country. I also made it very clear...na basta maayos lang.

ZTE's advances to Abalos

Sometime in December, the ZTE rep, si Yu Yong at saka si Fan Yang, who get quite close to me, along the progress of the work, were already getting frantic and talking to me about developments in the project, because they’d already gave enough advances daw to Chairman Abalos. So, sabi ko sa kanila, the project is moving along, they should not be alarmed.

So, it was also at this point because of Joey’s hesitance to agree on the $130-million commission, that Chairman Abalos started considering doing the project on his own, deretso na siya.

Ang sabi ko ho sa kanya na hindi ho puwedeng de-deretcho kayo, kasi ang kabilin-bilinan ni Secretray Neri, na yun din ata ang utos ng Presidente, na this project can only be done through a BOT basis, hindi puwedeng utang.

'Tawagan natin si FG'

So I was standing firm on that, na hindi talaga pupuwede. At that point, that was the time that Chairman Abalos said, halika, tawagan natin si FG. So, sabi niya, nung tinawagan niya, pare nandito yung taga NEDA sa tabi ko, hindi raw puwedeng i-utang yung project ko.

I cannot hear the voice from the other end, pero sabi n’ya, kung ganyan kayong kausap, and the Chairman continues, kung ganyan kayong kausap, ang hirap n’yo palang kausap, kalimutan n’yo na lang ang usapan natin.

I don’t know what that meant. But the following day, totoo nga, a letter from the Chinese ambassador came addressed to the government, and… with Mike, stating that this is already December.

'Moderate their greed'

You can check this with the records. I’m just doing this through my own recollection. But if you can check sometime December, a letter addressed to Mike yata, came in from the Chinese ambassador saying that there is now money available for a loan, for the NBN project, independent of the cyber-education project.

Kasi yung cyber-education yun ang napag-agree-han na ilo-loan na. Ngayon there’s another loan na naman na puwede na rin yung NBN i-loan, it was sometime early December.

So, I told the Secretary about it, Secretary Neri. And his instruction to me was very clear, sabi n'ya, Jun, you moderate their greed. I was naive to accept that order. I do not know what moderating greed means, but I followed Secretary Neri.

'Pare, okay na kami sa NEDA'

And due to the insistence naman nitong mga taga ZTE that the project gets going, Chairman Abalos invited us sometime on the third week of December, I’m pretty sure of the timing, over dinner in Makati Shang-rila. He asked to invite Joey as well, kasi si FG will be there with us.

Actually the First Gentlemen did not say much, except that Chairman Abalos told him na pare okay na kami nina Joey, ok na kami sa NEDA. (and the FG answered) Ah, ganon, mabuti naman, okay na , okay na.

So, I’m just narrating to you with no malice intended. Whatever that means, kayo na po ang bahalang umano.

And on their trip to China, I did not join them anymore, and I guess Joey can speak omn what happened in China.

Like the North Rail

Sometime in early January naman, Secretray Neri again invited us for lunch with Abalos in Edsa, in Makati-Shangrila in a Chinese restaurant together with Yu Yong and Fan Yang, the ZTE, and the Chinese commercial councilor. At that point, the Chairman again was making the impression that the project is already a go. May be there was parallel trust…because…(but) it was not yet a go.

So there was some negative reaction from the ZTE person, and the Secretary noticed some awkward moments there, and then he immediately ask a leave, and said that he had to go, and asked me to stay behind.

Chairman Abalos and the ZTE guy were in curious exchange of words, because the ZTE people were like demanding from Chairman Abalos that he promised that the ZTE deal will be done on a loan project under the North Rail. I don’t know why they speak about the North Rail. I don’t know why they speak about the North Rail. They keep on mentioning ala North Rail terms loan agreement.

'Alam mo bang…?'

So, that was last meeting I had with the Chairman. And on January 18, I remember the date very well. This is the only date that I can remember because this was the date I said bye to the project.

I was then in Dumaguete in Negros, together with Henry Teves, when Chairman Abalos called me up, to some like early evening, and asked me questions like, “Alam ba ni Neri yung ginagawa mo, (I said) Opo. Alam ba ni Neri yung ginawa mo. Opo. Alam mo bang malapit ako sa military. Opo. Alam mong malapit ako sa intelligence. Opo. Alam mo namang malapit ako…

And then he started cursing. Mura siya nang mura in Tagalog, lahat-lahat. At ang sabi niya, nandito sa akin yung CD lahat ng phone conversations ninyo nina Joey, mga hayop kayo, tina-traydor n’yo ko.

I don’t know what gave him that impression..but the fact, that they said I know the week 17 in ISAPF can do that, which Chairman Abalos and Ruben Reyes are …close to, I was not surprised.

So, I just took with a grain, and then Chairman Abalos ended up…his words with, “Huwag kang magpapakita sa aking hayop ka sa Wack –Wack o sa Mandaluyong at ipapapatay kita."

That’s when all my troubles started. So, I quit the project. I told the Secretary that I don;lt think this project is worth risking my life for. All I did was trying to help the Secretary understand it.

So on February 2007, the executive order was issued. So this is now my personal participation ended and where it ended for the project concept.

From $262M to $329M

In February 2007, an EO was issued by the Office of the President, transferring the telos, the implementing agency to DOTC. And on April, the project… the NBN was approved…at $329 million.

When I quit the project, the project cost was $262 million. So it was approved. I don’t know what happened then. I’m not imputing anything now. But when it was approved, it was already approved at $329 million. And the day after it was approved, the President together with PagCor officials, went to China to witness the signing of the agreement.

This project for me is one transactional example of a dysfunctional government procurement, a systemic dysfunction on how we procure projects. There are other more that have escaped scrutiny, but ganun din ang sistema. And I have agonized over this decision...

Ang dasal ko lang sana maintindihan n’yo yung dusang dinananas ng pamilya ko ngayon. Ang dasal ko lang sana matutunan na natin after nito na ang salitang Pilpino ay hindi lang tumutkoy sa isang pamilya. Ang salitang Pilipino ay tumutukoy sa isang bansa, ang bansang Pilipino. And sometimes, it’s worth taking a risk for this country.

source: http://www.gmanews.tv/story/79634/Transcript-of-Lozadas-expos%E9-Halika-tawagan-natin-si-FG

Sphere: Related Content